Adaptive Behavior

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dahl, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Giraud-Carrier, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Adaptive Behavior, Vol. 13, No. 3, 243-260 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/105971230501300305

Incremental Development of Adaptive Behaviors using Trees of Self-Contained Solutions

Torbjørn Semb Dahl

Department of Computing, University of Wales, Newport, torbjorn.dahl{at}newport.ac.uk

Christophe Giraud-Carrier

Department of Computer Science, Brigham Young University, cgc{at}cs.byu.edu

We present a methodology for incremental development of complex adaptive behaviors in robots. The methodology decomposes a given root strategy into a tree of self-contained supporting strategies that can be fully implemented and tested before the next strategy is added. The methodology also uses comparative performance tests for each new strategy relative to its predecessor. The methodology assumes the use of skill modules that can be shared by multiple behavioral layers and produces learning mechanisms that are highly specialized and context dependent. Two example applications of the methodology are presented using simulated robots in the domains of foraging/mapping and conflict resolution. The examples are implemented by hand using a decomposed model of behavior that allows skill modules to be shared while retaining a unique representation of each strategy for excitation and inhibition. Finally, we discuss how the solutions produced using this methodology differ from existing behavior-based solutions.

Key Words: incremental development • learning • foraging • mapping • conflict resolution


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?