Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Adaptive Behavior
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beer, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Dynamics of Active Categorical Perception in an Evolved Model Agent

Randall D. Beer

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, and Department of Biology Case Western Reserve University

Notions of embodiment, situatedness, and dynamics are increasingly being debated in cognitive sci ence. However, these debates are often carried out in the absence of concrete examples. In order to build intuition, this paper explores a model agent to illustrate how the perspective and tools of dynam ical systems theory can be applied to the analysis of situated, embodied agents capable of minimally cognitive behavior. Specifically, we study a model agent whose "nervous system" was evolved using a genetic algorithm to catch circular objects and to avoid diamond-shaped ones. After characterizing the performance, behavioral strategy and psychophysics of the best-evolved agent, its dynamics are analyzed in some detail at three different levels: (1) the entire coupled brain/body/environment sys tem; (2) the interaction between agent and environment that generates the observed coupled dynam ics; (3) the underlying neuronal properties responsible for the agent dynamics. This analysis offers both explanatory insight and testable predictions. The paper concludes with discussions of the overall picture that emerges from this analysis, the challenges this picture poses to traditional notions of rep resentation, and the utility of a research methodology involving the analysis of simpler idealized mod els of complete brain/body/environment systems.

Key Words: dynamics • minimally-cognitive behavior • categorical perception

Adaptive Behavior, Vol. 11, No. 4, 209-243 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1059712303114001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
X. E. Barandiaran, E. Di Paolo, and M. Rohde
Defining Agency: Individuality, Normativity, Asymmetry, and Spatio-temporality in Action
Adaptive Behavior, October 1, 2009; 17(5): 367 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
H. De Jaegher and T. Froese
On the Role of Social Interaction in Individual Agency
Adaptive Behavior, October 1, 2009; 17(5): 444 - 460.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
B. Webb
Animals Versus Animats: Or Why Not Model the Real Iguana?
Adaptive Behavior, August 1, 2009; 17(4): 269 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
R. D. Beer and P. L. Williams
Animals and Animats: Why Not Both Iguanas?
Adaptive Behavior, August 1, 2009; 17(4): 296 - 302.
[PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
M. Hoffmann and R. Pfeifer
Let Animats Live!
Adaptive Behavior, August 1, 2009; 17(4): 317 - 319.
[PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
P. Husbands
Never Mind the Iguana, What About the Tortoise? Models in Adaptive Behavior
Adaptive Behavior, August 1, 2009; 17(4): 320 - 324.
[PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
J. Noble and M. de Pinedo
Iguana Modeling Is Not the Only Game in Town
Adaptive Behavior, August 1, 2009; 17(4): 331 - 333.
[PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
M. Rohde
No Need for Intellectual Straightjackets
Adaptive Behavior, August 1, 2009; 17(4): 334 - 337.
[PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
A. Seth
Don't Throw the Baby Iguana Out With the Bathwater
Adaptive Behavior, August 1, 2009; 17(4): 338 - 342.
[PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
S. Wischmann
Do Animat Models Always Need a Biological Target Organism?
Adaptive Behavior, August 1, 2009; 17(4): 343 - 345.
[PDF]

Home page
 Cogn Affect Behav NeurosciHome page
S. Scherbaum, M. Dshemuchadse, and A. Kalis
Making decisions with a continuous mind
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, December 1, 2008; 8(4): 454 - 474.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
O. Gigliotta and S. Nolfi
On the Coupling Between Agent Internal and Agent/ Environmental Dynamics: Development of Spatial Representations in Evolving Autonomous Robots
Adaptive Behavior, April 1, 2008; 16(2-3): 148 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
S. Wischmann, M. Hulse, J. F. Knabe, and F. Pasemann
Synchronization of Internal Neural Rhythms in Multi-Robotic Systems
Adaptive Behavior, June 1, 2006; 14(2): 117 - 127.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
X. Barandiaran and A. Moreno
On What Makes Certain Dynamical Systems Cognitive: A Minimally Cognitive Organization Program
Adaptive Behavior, June 1, 2006; 14(2): 171 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Adaptive BehaviorHome page
M. van Dartel, I. Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper, E. Postma, and J. van den Herik
Reactive Agents and Perceptual Ambiguity
Adaptive Behavior, September 1, 2005; 13(3): 227 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]